?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Sauntering Vaguely Downward [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Mad Scientess Jane Expat

Serious Business | Flickr
Bounty Information | Wanted Dead or Alive: Mad Scientess Nanila
Deeds of Derring-Do | Full of Wild Inaccuracies and Exaggerations

In the Winter Garden [20090113|23:19]
Mad Scientess Jane Expat
[Tags|]





These are both multiple exposures shot at Anglesey Abbey in the winter garden from my latest roll of Holga film. Much as I love my fantastic little chunk of medium-format plastic, I may have to give up on the habit. When I had the first roll of 12 developed, it cost £15 for development, prints and scans, which was steep. Then I started using the slide film taische was kind enough to send me. This cost £20. It hasn't crept up since, but it's also been a couple of months since I shot anything on film. This latest roll? £30 for development, prints and scans. That's actually a fair amount of acrylic paint, right there. Unless I can find a cheaper place to get the stuff developed, I think this might be the last time I use the Holga for a while.
linkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: nimoloth
2009-01-14 09:50 (UTC)
That's really expensive! Is it just novelty stuff like that or all film development these days? Perhaps you could try developing it yourself. But it's very messy and time consuming. I know - you need to rig up a digital holga!
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: nanila
2009-01-14 18:52 (UTC)
Well, I think it has to do with the way slide film is processed. They're "positives", not negatives, and I believe it's a procedure that's difficult to perform in a home darkroom. Otherwise I'd give it a go.

There are some good guides out there to faking Holga (and other Lomo camera) shots with digital images. I think I'll be trying that instead.

Edited at 2009-01-14 06:53 pm (UTC)
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)