?

Log in

No account? Create an account
On the subject of having children and wielding power - Sauntering Vaguely Downward [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Mad Scientess Jane Expat

Serious Business | Flickr
Bounty Information | Wanted Dead or Alive: Mad Scientess Nanila
Deeds of Derring-Do | Full of Wild Inaccuracies and Exaggerations

On the subject of having children and wielding power [20160711|12:22]
Mad Scientess Jane Expat
[Tags|, ]

If you're not up on UK politics, there has been a kerfuffle recently because one of the candidates for Conservative Party Leader (and thus Prime Minister) has declared heavily implied that having children confers upon a parent an additional level of empathy, long-sightedness and investment in the future. Hence the other candidate, who is childless, is not as well suited to wield power and lead the party (and thus the country). Both of the candidates are women.

Has the lack of correlation between parenthood and sagacity really been so insufficiently demonstrated by men in power who have children?

ETA: In the time it took me to write this post, Candidate #1 has withdrawn from the leadership race.

This entry was originally posted at http://nanila.dreamwidth.org/1035862.html. The titration count is at comment count unavailable.0 pKa.
linkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: mysterysquid
2016-07-13 09:53 (UTC)
Just watching UK politics from a distance with horror and fascination.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: nanila
2016-07-13 19:57 (UTC)
Tonight's Cabinet appointments are providing a heavy dose of both! /o\
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)